Critique of OOP


Over at Ktismatics there is an interesting critique of object oriented philosophy, with some insightful and amusing commentary. For what its worth I think that John’s claim that

with respect to the relationship between minds and the objects of thought, OOO’s radically apophatic ontology seems interchangeable with a radically agnostic epistemology.

is part of the reason that I have been drawn to object oriented thinking, and also part of the reason I wouldn’t say I am an object oriented thinker (in whatever way my limited understanding would allow). I think that in a sense this radical agnosticism is precisely part of what I mean when I talk about entities being ambivalent. Its not that there is this interchangeability between ontology and epistemology more that questions of entities interrelations make this just one ambivalence that they enact. In some of my previous posts I’ve given a very vague attempt at approaching this.


No Responses Yet to “Critique of OOP”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: